Welcome Guest
Active Topics
CCL Messageboard
»
CCL Comics Library
»
Change Request Discussion
»
Married Characters and other Identity Crises
Married Characters and other Identity Crises
Options
Previous Topic
Next Topic
Watch this topic
Email this topic
Print this topic
RSS Feed
3 pages: [1]
2
3
sgriffin
Thursday, January 15, 2009 9:12:02 AM
Rank:
Celestial
Groups:
CCL Feature Crew, Member
Location:
North Carolina
Joined:
4/29/2007 |
Posts:
3,173 |
Points:
549,945
We just voted over in the Approver lounge to work on consolidating characters who have, for various reasons, changed their "real name" over the years. The most common reason for this change is marriage.
The way we will be handling these combined character names will be by listing the various names seperated by a slash (/). In addition to merging names, we will also be editing some existing merged names to a more proper form.
This purpose of this thread is to seek out candidates for the merger, and to host any discussion needed on the proper form a particular merger should take. I'll kick it off by listing the names in the database that have already been pointed out, along with my suggestions for the combined/updated name. I'll maintain this list as the discussion continues.
On some of the larger mergers, I think we can leverage Mr. Miracle's scripting ability to perform the merges and save us hundreds of edits. The smaller merges can be handled individually when we've figured out exactly what the merged name should be.
Source Name(s) -> New Entry
Janet Van Dyne, Janet Pym -> Janet Van Dyne / Janet Pym
Marlo Chandler Jones -> Marlo Chandler / Marlo Jones
Betty Ross, Betty Ross-Banner -> Betty Ross / Betty Banner
Charity, Charity O'Dare -> Charity / Charity O'Dare
Betty Brant Leeds -> Betty Brant / Betty Leeds
Jean Grey-Summers -> Jean Grey / Jean Summers
James (Jim) "Logan" Howlett -> Logan / James "Jim" Howlett
Jennifer "Jen" Walters -> Jennifer "Jen" Walters / Jennifer "Jen" Jameson
Susan "Sue" Storm-Richards -> Susan "Sue" Storm / Susan "Sue" Richards
Mary Jane Watson, Mary Jane Watson-Parker -> Mary Jane Watson / Mary Jane Watson-Parker
Lyja, Lyja Storm -> Lyja / Lyja Storm
Elizabeth "Liz" Allan Osborn -> Elizabeth "Liz" Allan / Elizabeth "Liz" Osborn
Tim Drake -> Tim Drake / Tim Wayne
Dr. Marla Madison, Doctor Marla Jameson -> Doctor Marla Madison / Doctor Marla Jameson
Update
: I've submitted change requests on all the above up to Liz Allen.
Megalomaniac Extraordinaire
Back to top
ntkeith
Thursday, January 15, 2009 9:38:46 AM
Rank:
Herald of Galactus
Groups:
Guru, Member
Location:
Denver, CO
Joined:
4/16/2007 |
Posts:
1,750 |
Points:
146,231
Only one thought here, for the sake of shortness on the entries, what about no repeating first names??
"Jennifer "Jen" Walters / Jennifer "Jen" Jameson" becomes...
"Jennifer "Jen" Walters / Jameson"
Before we had to repeat, because that is the only way the software search worked. But now that isn't true.
You've heard the legend, now see it come to life!
I Want More Comics
Back to top
sgriffin
Thursday, January 15, 2009 9:45:55 AM
Rank:
Celestial
Groups:
CCL Feature Crew, Member
Location:
North Carolina
Joined:
4/29/2007 |
Posts:
3,173 |
Points:
549,945
As the first names (or first+shortened+middle) names get longer, I agree, but for the shorter names, I just think "Betty Brant / Betty Leeds" is easier to understand. So I'm not sure which way to go. What do the others think?
Megalomaniac Extraordinaire
Back to top
ntkeith
Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:06:02 AM
Rank:
Herald of Galactus
Groups:
Guru, Member
Location:
Denver, CO
Joined:
4/16/2007 |
Posts:
1,750 |
Points:
146,231
I see the value at the longer names, for sure, and see your point, but if we go one way or another, they all should be that. That way no one has to decide which way should it be.
I don't mind long names, but that was the biggest objection to combining them, so I was looking for an answer that helped that idea out.
You've heard the legend, now see it come to life!
I Want More Comics
Back to top
ntkeith
Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:09:10 AM
Rank:
Herald of Galactus
Groups:
Guru, Member
Location:
Denver, CO
Joined:
4/16/2007 |
Posts:
1,750 |
Points:
146,231
Also, being careful not to mix different characters here. Like in the Ultimate Universe, Wand and Pietro are Lehnsherr, in the normal universe they are Maximoff. These should not be combined, and while this kinda applies to Janet Pym, she is better off combined because she has been called both in the same universe. So only those that are mixed in the same universe should be combined, then the issue of different universes is dealt with in a separate step, like has been discussed before, when the Character DB gets an overhaul.
You've heard the legend, now see it come to life!
I Want More Comics
Back to top
SwiftMann
Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:27:19 AM
Rank:
Beyonder
Groups:
Approver, CCL Feature Crew, CR-Guidelines, Member
Location:
PA
Joined:
4/19/2007 |
Posts:
13,841 |
Points:
2,483,360
sgriffin wrote:
Source Name(s) -> New Entry
Janet Van Dyne, Janet Pym -> Janet Van Dyne / Janet Pym
Marlo Chandler Jones -> Marlo Chandler / Marlo Jones
Betty Ross, Betty Ross-Banner -> Betty Ross / Betty Banner
Charity, Charity O'Dare -> Charity / Charity O'Dare
Betty Brant Leeds -> Betty Brant / Betty Leeds
Jean Grey-Summers -> Jean Grey / Jean Summers
Tim Drake -> Tim Drake / Tim Wayne
James (Jim) "Logan" Howlett -> Logan / James (Jim) Howlett
Jennifer "Jen" Walters -> Jennifer "Jen" Walters / Jennifer "Jen" Jameson
Susan "Sue" Storm-Richards -> Susan "Sue" Storm / Susan "Sue" Richards
And I think the full name needs to be repeated. I found Keith's example of Jennifer "Jen" Walters / Jameson confusing.
Back to top
Spider-Man
Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:15:20 PM
Rank:
Celestial
Groups:
Approver, Beta, CR-Management, Member, Subscriber
Location:
USA
Joined:
1/5/2007 |
Posts:
4,736 |
Points:
382,431
Mary Jane Watson, Mary Jane Watson-Parker -> Mary Jane Watson / Mary Jane Watson-Parker
For some reason, all the "Mary Jane Watson" characters became invalid with directions to use "Mary Jane Watson-Parker". That is incorrect because it changed all her appearances before she got married (which never really happened!?!) to the married name. She needs to have a slashed name.
SpiderFan.org
Back to top
sgriffin
Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:21:11 PM
Rank:
Celestial
Groups:
CCL Feature Crew, Member
Location:
North Carolina
Joined:
4/29/2007 |
Posts:
3,173 |
Points:
549,945
Spider-Man wrote:
Mary Jane Watson, Mary Jane Watson-Parker -> Mary Jane Watson / Mary Jane Watson-Parker
For some reason, all the "Mary Jane Watson" characters became invalid with directions to use "Mary Jane Watson-Parker". That is incorrect because it changed all her appearances before she got married (which never really happened!?!) to the married name. She needs to have a slashed name.
Been waiting for someone to suggest that one. I added it to the list.
Megalomaniac Extraordinaire
Back to top
MrMiracle
Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:40:19 PM
Rank:
Administration
Groups:
Forum Admin, Member, Subscriber
Joined:
1/5/2007 |
Posts:
2,600 |
Points:
-456,002
short reminder -- there's a hard data limit of 255 characters for a character name (and over 100 characters starts looking REEEEAAAAL ugly).
Settle down beavis.
Rules
-
binary solo....
Back to top
sgriffin
Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:51:13 PM
Rank:
Celestial
Groups:
CCL Feature Crew, Member
Location:
North Carolina
Joined:
4/29/2007 |
Posts:
3,173 |
Points:
549,945
So far we're at a max of 48 characters. Unless She-Hulk gets married to John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt we should be fine.
Megalomaniac Extraordinaire
Back to top
Sirs
Thursday, January 15, 2009 4:31:13 PM
Rank:
Herald of Galactus
Groups:
Member
Location:
where else my house in NC
Joined:
1/25/2008 |
Posts:
2,251 |
Points:
80,531
most women go by the current name of the person they are married to not all of them.If your going to used married names do it right. Looks stupid doing it with all the married names, just my opinion nothing more
You Gotta Go Here
http://www.heroesonwheels.com/
If you can help with anything please check this out
Our Little Binga
Back to top
sgriffin
Thursday, January 15, 2009 4:38:37 PM
Rank:
Celestial
Groups:
CCL Feature Crew, Member
Location:
North Carolina
Joined:
4/29/2007 |
Posts:
3,173 |
Points:
549,945
Sirs wrote:
most women go by the current name of the person they are married to not all of them.If your going to used married names do it right. Looks stupid doing it with all the married names, just my opinion nothing more
I have no idea what you're trying to suggest. Could you give an example of how you would "do it right" instead of just complaining that it looks stupid?
Megalomaniac Extraordinaire
Back to top
DaLeah96
Thursday, January 15, 2009 5:10:46 PM
Rank:
Beyonder
Groups:
Guru, Member, Reviews Host
Location:
Just across the river from Metropolis
Joined:
10/1/2007 |
Posts:
18,280 |
Points:
98,879
Sirs wrote:
most women go by the current name of the person they are married to not all of them.If your going to used married names do it right. Looks stupid doing it with all the married names, just my opinion nothing more
That may be true, however using only Susan "Sue" Richards would only work in noting comics she appears after marriage. She was not Richards in the early issues yet so should not be listed as such. Having the merged listing does show that this is the same person.
On another issue why is it
Logan / James (Jim) Howlett
and not
Logan / James "Jim" Howlett
, there seems to be an inconsistency here.
Make sure that you read and understand the forum rules
here
.
Back to top
sgriffin
Thursday, January 15, 2009 5:15:55 PM
Rank:
Celestial
Groups:
CCL Feature Crew, Member
Location:
North Carolina
Joined:
4/29/2007 |
Posts:
3,173 |
Points:
549,945
DaLeah96 wrote:
On another issue why is it
Logan / James (Jim) Howlett
and not
Logan / James "Jim" Howlett
, there seems to be an inconsistency here.
This sort of constructive feedback is exactly why I put the topic up and requested comments on it instead of just going out on my own and hacking up the database. Thanks Dale - I fixed it.
Megalomaniac Extraordinaire
Back to top
ntkeith
Thursday, January 15, 2009 5:18:47 PM
Rank:
Herald of Galactus
Groups:
Guru, Member
Location:
Denver, CO
Joined:
4/16/2007 |
Posts:
1,750 |
Points:
146,231
Sirs wrote:
most women go by the current name of the person they are married to not all of them.If your going to used married names do it right. Looks stupid doing it with all the married names, just my opinion nothing more
If what your talking about is adding it to anyone who gets married, that is correct, we wouldn't. No name get changed until someone calls them that, or the Publisher starts using it. Did Lois Lane ever go by Lois Kent?? If no, then it does not get added. But Jen is credited as Jameson on her trading cards and the Marvel site, so that is enough.
You've heard the legend, now see it come to life!
I Want More Comics
Back to top
Spider-Man
Thursday, January 15, 2009 5:52:36 PM
Rank:
Celestial
Groups:
Approver, Beta, CR-Management, Member, Subscriber
Location:
USA
Joined:
1/5/2007 |
Posts:
4,736 |
Points:
382,431
sgriffin wrote:
So far we're at a max of 48 characters. Unless She-Hulk gets married to John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt we should be fine.
Here's a long one already in the database:
Abigail "Abby" Arcane / Abigail "Abby" Cable / Abigail "Abby" Holland
And thanks, now I have that stupid song in my head!!
SpiderFan.org
Back to top
Sirs
Thursday, January 15, 2009 6:40:42 PM
Rank:
Herald of Galactus
Groups:
Member
Location:
where else my house in NC
Joined:
1/25/2008 |
Posts:
2,251 |
Points:
80,531
sgriffin wrote:
Sirs wrote:
most women go by the current name of the person they are married to not all of them.If your going to used married names do it right. Looks stupid doing it with all the married names, just my opinion nothing more
I have no idea what you're trying to suggest. Could you give an example of how you would "do it right" instead of just complaining that it looks stupid?
What I meant is not useing all the last names of marriages before I don't mean separately, I mean all of them in one instance understand?
You Gotta Go Here
http://www.heroesonwheels.com/
If you can help with anything please check this out
Our Little Binga
Back to top
Spider-Man
Thursday, January 15, 2009 6:50:24 PM
Rank:
Celestial
Groups:
Approver, Beta, CR-Management, Member, Subscriber
Location:
USA
Joined:
1/5/2007 |
Posts:
4,736 |
Points:
382,431
Sirs wrote:
sgriffin wrote:
Sirs wrote:
most women go by the current name of the person they are married to not all of them.If your going to used married names do it right. Looks stupid doing it with all the married names, just my opinion nothing more
I have no idea what you're trying to suggest. Could you give an example of how you would "do it right" instead of just complaining that it looks stupid?
What I meant is not useing all the last names of marriages before I don't mean separately, I mean all of them in one instance understand?
Do you mean only use the current married name without any slashes?
That would not work because it would create a new character and the links to the former, unmarried character may get lost.
SpiderFan.org
Back to top
icarus201
Thursday, January 15, 2009 6:53:20 PM
Rank:
Beyonder
Groups:
Approver, CR-Policies, Forum Admin, Member, Moderator, Movies Host, Subscriber, UK Host
Location:
United Kingdom
Joined:
8/17/2007 |
Posts:
44,187 |
Points:
1,470,203
ntkeith wrote:
Also, being careful not to mix different characters here. Like in the Ultimate Universe, Wand and Pietro are Lehnsherr, in the normal universe they are Maximoff. These should not be combined, and while this kinda applies to Janet Pym, she is better off combined because she has been called both in the same universe. So only those that are mixed in the same universe should be combined, then the issue of different universes is dealt with in a separate step, like has been discussed before, when the Character DB gets an overhaul.
I'm with you on this point. Especially in the case of the Wasp. In the Ultimate Universe she is only referred to as 'Janet Pym'. As far as I know, there hasn't been a mention of her maiden name. So combining Van Dyne and Pym might lead to unnecessary misleading data.
Marvel Universe
®
~
N
o-one
E
ver
R
eally
D
ies.
Make sure that you read and understand the forum rules
here
Back to top
icarus201
Thursday, January 15, 2009 6:58:27 PM
Rank:
Beyonder
Groups:
Approver, CR-Policies, Forum Admin, Member, Moderator, Movies Host, Subscriber, UK Host
Location:
United Kingdom
Joined:
8/17/2007 |
Posts:
44,187 |
Points:
1,470,203
icarus201 wrote:
ntkeith wrote:
Also, being careful not to mix different characters here. Like in the Ultimate Universe, Wand and Pietro are Lehnsherr, in the normal universe they are Maximoff. These should not be combined, and while this kinda applies to Janet Pym, she is better off combined because she has been called both in the same universe. So only those that are mixed in the same universe should be combined, then the issue of different universes is dealt with in a separate step, like has been discussed before, when the Character DB gets an overhaul.
I'm with you on this point. Especially in the case of the Wasp. In the Ultimate Universe she is only referred to as 'Janet Pym'. As far as I know, there hasn't been a mention of her maiden name. So combining Van Dyne and Pym might lead to unnecessary misleading data.
Strike that. I checked Marvel.com. They've got Van Dyne listed as her maiden name. Should have checked first.
Marvel Universe
®
~
N
o-one
E
ver
R
eally
D
ies.
Make sure that you read and understand the forum rules
here
Back to top
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 pages: [1]
2
3
Forum Jump
CCL News
- CCL News and Events
- Software/Website Updates
- CCL Website/Live Market
- CCL Desktop Software
--- MsMacDugle's Visual Help Presentations
- CCL iPhone App
- CCL's Official YouTube Channel
- CCL Android App
- CCL Windows Phone 7 App
- Comic Conventions!
- CCL FAQ/Q&A
Comic Book Talk
- New Releases
- Comic Books
--- History and Comic Books
- Comic Book Reviews
--- Marvel Reviews
--- DC Reviews
--- Other Reviews
- DC Characters
- Marvel Characters
- Characters from Other Publishers
- Marvel Comics
- DC Comics
- UK Comics and Collectors
- Comics, Other Publishers
- Newsstand Editions
- Creator's Corner
Collecting
- Collecting, General Discussion
--- Ask the Experts
- Please Grade My Book
- Toys and Action Figures
- Trading Cards
- CCG / Gaming Cards
- Statues/Busts
The Water Cooler
- Life Outside of Comics
--- Comic Collectors Anonymous
- SUPERHERO SHOWDOWN
- CCLer Bios
- Games
--- Infinity Challenge
- Movies
- TV
- Horror
- Music, Video Games, and Other Media
- VS
- Sports
Comics Marketplace
- The Seller's Corner
- The Buyer's Corner
CCL Comics Library
- Comics Library General Discussion
- Change Request Discussion
--- Comic Books, GNs, TPBs, HCs and Mags
--- Action Figures
--- Trading Cards
--- CCG / Gaming Cards
--- Statues/ Busts
Access
You
cannot
post new topics in this forum.
You
cannot
reply to topics in this forum.
You
cannot
delete your posts in this forum.
You
cannot
edit your posts in this forum.
You
cannot
create polls in this forum.
You
cannot
vote in polls in this forum.
Main Forum RSS :
This page was generated in 0.269 seconds.
(0.129 seconds)
Print this topic
RSS Feed
Watch this topic
Email this topic
Threaded
Normal